|
|
| | Book | | | ✉ Contact | | | +212 600 608 608 |
Riad Vendôme is rated 4.2/5 on Google (617 reviews), 4.2/5 on TripAdvisor and 8.3/10 on Booking.com. Here are testimonials from our travellers: couples, families, groups of friends, corporates. Experiences at the riad, spa, desert and private events.
In brief: Riad Vendôme guest reviews
Rooms at Riad Vendôme start from 70 € a night for two, breakfast 5 € per person. Guests book directly with the riad, with no platform commission.
The reviews don't lie. Since 2011, Riad Vendôme has hosted thousands of travellers. Some come for a weekend, others for a desert circuit, others still to hire the riad exclusively for a birthday or a seminar. What they all share is the same joy, and the same urge to come back.
Response within minutes. Free quote, no commitment.
Or fill out our Reservation form
| Platform | Rating | Number of reviews | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 / 5 ★★★★☆ | 617 reviews | View on Google | |
| TripAdvisor | 4.2 / 5 ★★★★☆ | 267 reviews | View on TripAdvisor |
| Booking.com | 8.3 / 10 | 200+ reviews | View reviews |
« An unforgettable experience. The bivouac under the stars, the Gnaoua music, the sunrise over the dunes… Éric organised every detail with care. We recommend it 100%. »

"New Year's Eve in the Merzouga desert will remain our finest travel memory. The meal was delicious, the magical atmosphere, and the silence of the Sahara at midnight… indescribable."
"Zagora circuit as a couple, 3 days of pure bliss. The riad is sublime, the desert grandiose, and Éric is an exceptional host. Unbeatable value for money. »
« The Riad Vendôme is a gem. Éric's welcome is exceptional, the riad is magnificent and the hammam is pure bliss. You feel right at home, only better. We'd go back with our eyes closed. »
« Of all the riads we have tested in Marrakech, this is the best value for money. The patio is sublime, the breakfast fit for royalty and the rooftop jacuzzi with Atlas views, magical. »
« Grand Tour Merzouga + Zagora with family (2 children). The children loved the camels and the bivouac. The journey is long but the landscapes breathtaking. The riad is a real haven on return. »
« The perfect couple's weekend. The hammam is authentic, the argan oil massage divine, and dinner on the rooftop at sunset, a suspended moment in time. Éric! »
« Dream hen party! We privately hired the riad for 12 girls and everything was perfect: the cooking class, the hammam, the evenings in the patio. Éric organised everything from A to Z. »
« We were looking for a quiet, well-located boutique hotel run by a French owner. The Riad Vendôme ticks all the boxes. The Dar El Bacha district is peaceful and the medina is just a stone's throw away. »
« Corporate seminar (15 guests) in an exceptional setting. The private venue, the food, the hammam after the meetings, nothing like a conventional hotel. The team was delighted. »
Stayed at Riad Vendôme? Share your experience on Google or TripAdvisor. Every review helps us improve, and helps other travellers make their choice.
Choosing a riad from a screen is harder than choosing a hotel, and reviews are where most travellers try to resolve the uncertainty. The difficulty is that riad reviews are not really comparable to hotel reviews. A hotel is a standardised product judged against a standard; a riad is a converted private house in a historic medina, and every guest who writes about one is really writing about the distance between what they expected and what they found. Read that way, a set of reviews becomes far more useful than the number printed above it. This section is an attempt to explain, honestly, how to read reviews of any riad in Marrakech, including ours, and what the scores on this page do and do not mean.
It surprises people that one property can carry three different-looking scores at the same time. The explanation is not manipulation; it is that the three platforms are measuring different things, with different populations, on different scales. Riad Vendôme shows 4.2/5 on Google, 4.2/5 on TripAdvisor and 8.3/10 on Booking.com. Those are not three verdicts on the same question.
Google asks for a single star rating with no sub-scores and no proof of stay. Anyone can leave one: a guest who spent a week, someone who came for a spa treatment or a meal, a person who called to ask about availability, or someone who never came at all. That breadth is a strength for volume and a weakness for precision. Booking.com, by contrast, only invites people who completed a booking through Booking.com, and asks them to score several categories which are then averaged onto a ten-point scale. That structure tends to compress results towards the middle and produces a number that cannot be read as if it were a percentage. TripAdvisor sits between the two: a bubble rating attached to a written review, a strong culture of long narrative feedback, and a visible local ranking that makes reviewers think comparatively rather than absolutely.
The practical consequence is simple. Never compare a Booking score against a Google score, and never compare a riad's Google score against a large resort's Google score without asking who was invited to vote. Compare like with like, on one platform at a time, and read the text rather than the number.
A score is a single number standing in for hundreds of different holidays. It cannot tell you whether the things that lowered it are things that would bother you. In the medina this matters more than almost anywhere else, because a large share of riad criticism concerns characteristics that were knowable in advance and are not defects at all.
Three examples that recur across the whole of the Marrakech medina, not just here. A riad is reached on foot: vehicles cannot enter most derbs, so the last stretch is walked, luggage included. A riad is a historic house rather than a purpose-built hotel: rooms differ from one another in size, shape, light and outlook, because they were rooms in a family home before they were rooms in an address. And a riad turns inwards around a patio: sound travels across the courtyard, and a house built for shade in summer behaves differently in January than a modern building with sealed windows. None of that is a fault. All of it appears in reviews as though it were.
So when you see a score that is good rather than perfect, the useful question is not « what is wrong » but « what is this property, and is that the thing I want ». A guest who wanted a modern hotel with a lift, a car at the door and identical rooms is describing a genuine disappointment, but it is a disappointment about the category, not about the house. The same paragraph, read by someone who specifically wanted a riad in the medina, is a reassurance.
This is the least understood thing about riad ratings, and it is pure arithmetic. A resort with several hundred rooms accumulates reviews continuously; each new one barely moves the average, and a single difficult stay disappears into the mass. A riad has 12 rooms. It hosts a fraction of the guests, and so it collects a fraction of the reviews over the same period. Every individual opinion therefore carries far more weight in the average, and a small number of poor experiences, a delayed flight that turned into a difficult arrival, a booking made on a misunderstanding, an off day, leaves a visible mark for a long time.
The corollary is that small properties also recover slowly, so their published number lags reality in both directions. This is why the distribution matters more than the mean. Look at how many reviews sit at the top, whether the critical ones cluster around one specific recurring problem or are scattered across unrelated one-off circumstances, and whether the recent ones read differently from the older ones. A cluster is a signal. A scatter is noise. A number on its own tells you which of those you are looking at only by accident.
The recurring positives on this page are consistent and easy to state: the cooking, the welcome and the responsiveness of the host, the rooftop and its views, the pool and the spa, and the quiet of Dar El Bacha within walking distance of the busiest part of the city. Those themes are covered elsewhere on this page and we will not repeat them here.
What is more useful, and rarer on a page like this, is the other side. There are travellers for whom this riad is genuinely not the right choice, and it is better that they know before booking than afterwards.
There is a reliable tell. A review about quality describes something that failed: a thing that did not work, was not clean, was promised and not delivered, or was handled badly when raised. A review about mismatched expectations describes something that was always going to be true and treats it as a surprise. « We had to walk from the taxi » is the second kind. « We asked twice and nobody came » is the first.
Other markers of an expectations problem: the review compares the property against a completely different category of accommodation; it faults the location for being exactly where the listing said it was; it is written by someone who booked at short notice or through a channel that showed little information; or it praises everything and then deducts heavily for one structural feature of the building. None of these reviewers is dishonest. They are simply answering a question you may not be asking.
A practical filter: read the critical reviews first, ignore the star rating attached to them, and sort them into two piles, things that would also have been true for you, and things that would have annoyed you personally. Most travellers find the second pile is much smaller than the score suggested. If it is not, that is genuinely useful information, and you have saved yourself a bad holiday.
Reviews are far more informative when you go in with a specific question rather than a general one. Below is what we would actually search for in the text of reviews of any riad, ours included.
We do not run review campaigns, we do not send reminder sequences, we do not offer anything in exchange for a rating, and we do not ask guests privately whether they enjoyed their stay before deciding who to invite to review publicly. Every review on Google, TripAdvisor and Booking.com was left by someone who decided to write it unprompted. We have no ability to remove one we dislike, and we would not want it: a page of uniformly perfect ratings is the least credible thing a small property can display.
What we do instead is read them and reply to them, including the critical ones. That policy has an obvious cost, which is that our published number is lower than it would be if we managed it actively. We think that is the correct trade. A score that has not been curated is worth more to you than a score that has, precisely because you can use it to work out whether this house suits the holiday you are planning. If after reading all of this you are still unsure whether a riad is the right format for your trip at all, the comparison on riad or hotel in Marrakech is a better starting point than any rating, and you are welcome to put the question to us directly before you book.
Yes: 4.2/5 on Google (617 reviews), 4.2/5 on TripAdvisor and 8.3/10 on Booking.com.

The reviews on Google and TripAdvisor are published by verified real guests on these platforms.
Because the three platforms measure different things. Google accepts a single star rating from anyone, with no proof of stay. Booking.com invites only guests who booked through it, and averages several category scores onto a ten-point scale. TripAdvisor attaches a bubble rating to a written review and shows a local ranking, which makes reviewers think comparatively. Compare one platform at a time, never across them.
It is arithmetic rather than quality. A large hotel collects reviews continuously, so no single opinion moves its average. A riad with 12 rooms hosts far fewer guests and collects far fewer reviews over the same period, so each one carries much more weight. A handful of difficult stays remains visible for a long time, and improvements take just as long to show. Read the distribution, not the mean.
A genuine complaint describes something that failed: a thing that did not work, was not clean, was promised and not delivered, or was handled badly when raised. A mismatch describes something that was always going to be true and treats it as a surprise: walking the last stretch to the door, rooms differing from one another, a house rather than a hotel. Both are honest. Only the first tells you about quality.
No to both. We run no review campaigns, send no reminder sequences and offer nothing in exchange for a rating, and we never screen guests privately before deciding who to invite to review publicly. We also have no ability to remove a review we dislike. Every rating you see was left unprompted. We read them all and reply to them, including the critical ones.
A rating that has not been managed is more useful than one that has. Much of what pulls a medina riad below the top of the scale is predictable from the listing itself: an address reached on foot, a historic house with rooms that vary, a courtyard where sound carries. Read the critical reviews and sort them into things that would also have been true for you and things that would genuinely have spoiled your stay.
Look for mentions of the derb, the neighbours, the call to prayer and above all the patio, since sound in a riad travels across the courtyard as much as in from the street. A room opening onto the patio and a room near the roof are different propositions. Rather than inferring it from someone else's stay, tell us what you need and ask which room answers it.
Generally not. Guests rarely describe steps, thresholds, door widths or bathroom layouts with the precision someone with a mobility need requires, and a riad is built over several floors around a central patio. Treat reviews as background only, read our accessibility page, and then ask us directly about the specific constraint. It is far better to establish what is workable before booking than to discover it on arrival.
After reading through 500+ reviews across Google and TripAdvisor, certain themes recur with remarkable consistency. Three stand out. First: Naima's cooking. The 5/5 Google Cuisine rating is not an outlier: guests who arrive expecting standard Moroccan food are routinely surprised by the quality and variety of what she prepares. Second: Éric's responsiveness. Reviews consistently mention the speed and clarity of communication before and during the stay, which reduces anxiety and sets accurate expectations.
Third, and perhaps most telling: the surprise gap. Guests who discover Riad Vendôme through a price comparison frequently arrive expecting something modest and leave with a disproportionately positive impression. The property is larger than photos suggest, the rooftop is more spectacular than the description conveys, and the private pool, small at 5×3m but heated and exclusively yours: transforms the experience of a Marrakech break in ways that guests describe as unexpected.
To leave your own review after your stay, the fastest route is Google: g.page/r/CYybcQDE5x9kEBM/review. Éric and Naima read every review personally and respond to all of them.
You can leave a review on Google (search "Riad Vendôme Marrakech" and click "Write a review"), TripAdvisor, or our official site. Éric personally reads every review and responds to each one. Your feedback directly helps future guests make an informed decision.
The most common themes in reviews are: Éric's personal hospitality and responsiveness, Chef Naima's cooking classes and dinners, the rooftop jacuzzi and terrace views, the private pool, and the ideal location 7 minutes from Jemaa El-Fna. Google rates the riad 4.2/5 (617 reviews).
Riad Vendôme has 267 reviews on TripAdvisor, rated 4.2/5, and 200+ reviews on Booking.com, rated 8.3/10. On Google it has 617 reviews at 4.2/5, making it one of the most reviewed riads in the Marrakech medina.
The private pool at Riad Vendôme measures 5 by 3 metres. Guest reviews describe it as small but exclusively theirs, and note that it transforms the experience of a Marrakech break in ways many did not expect from the photos.
Chef Naima's cooking earns a 5 out of 5 Google Cuisine rating. Guests who arrive expecting standard Moroccan food are routinely surprised by the quality and variety of what she prepares, making it one of the most consistently praised themes in reviews.
Riad Vendôme is at 217 Derb El Halfaoui, in the Dar El Bacha district of the Marrakech medina. It is a 7-minute walk from Jemaa El-Fna square, close to the Koutoubia and the souks, so you reach the main sights on foot without needing a taxi. A member of staff meets you at the nearest vehicle drop-off point on arrival.
You book directly with the riad, not through a platform. Send your dates and group size on WhatsApp at +212 600 608 608 and you receive a written quote within minutes. There is no automated booking engine: every stay is confirmed by a person, and the payment terms are set out in the quote you receive.
Yes, Riad Vendôme can be hired exclusively. The main riad has 12 rooms and goes up to 20 rooms with a partner riad 100 metres away, for exclusive hire of up to 50 guests. During an exclusive hire there are no other guests: the pool, hammam, jacuzzi and rooftop are reserved for your group alone.
⭐ Google 4.2/5 (617 reviews) · 🏠 Booking 8.3/10 · ✈️ TripAdvisor 4.2/5 · 🎉 500+ events organised since 2013
The Riad Vendôme is classified by the Moroccan Ministry of Tourism.
Meet your host: Meet Éric, the owner.